Actually, speak of the relation of Japan and United States, had been played bad by media.
News of a lot of media has a problem, misinterpret Telangpu's meaning.
Although Telangpu expressed the dissatisfaction that defends an agreement to Rimeian, but dissatisfaction is not American garrison problem, however once have an accident, liability issue of Japan.
Tell on firm sense, this is the problem of two different levels.Treaty of day beautiful security had been made 60 old, it is the United States and the foundation that Japan concerns, also be the United States imprints too one of strategic cornerstone, so this treaty is not Telangpu wants to move kinetic, no matter be,abolish, want approval of United States Congress, also want Japanese congress to approve of course.
Telangpu just is opposite a few article in this treaty expressed dissatisfaction.
It is a bit strange that this dissatisfaction says to return. He thinks, if Japan suffers attack, the help according to treaty United States Japan fights; But if the United States suffers attack, japan did not help the obligation that the United States fights however.
Telangpu's understanding has a problem actually.Because in those days the real environment that the United States and Japan sign Rimeian to preserve treaty is beautiful Su Leng below battle big setting, the United States should be in Japan garrison, this is a reason that American can protect Japan.
That is to say, if Russia attacks Japan, the United States wants help Japan for a short while, best method is stationed in day of U.S. Army to dispatch namely. Rimeian protected treaty to become the good excuse of American garrison. Japan does not have method to object of course, can be obedient to only the meaning of American.
So, tell from this angle, telangpu did not understand Rimeian to preserve treaty the strategic value to the United States.
Of course he did not say the United States wants to be removed from Japan army, is to put forward his to think only treaty " imparity " view, as to how to solve, he also did not say.
Contrary, american government denies bilateral government to there is change in the footing on this treaty problem.In other words, the mood with American current government is, although Telangpu oppugns treaty, but this is Telangpu the individual's idea, did not rise to national strategy of the United States.
At the same time American government emphasizes, remove impossibly from Japan army.
If Telangpu wants to think really,remove from Japan actually army, to Japan character, still perhaps be a favour.
Install times OKer Japan of development of land of be perfectly justifiable's absolute military affairs power, this is according with the target that Japanese government is gone after for years.
Japan is very careful to Telangpu's manner nevertheless, the attitude that also states Japanese government preserves treaty to Rimeian also did not vary, american garrison position also did not change.