Whether are art and science put in some kind of substaintial connection?

This is a problem that is worth to solve. I solve doubt now.

Above all, we should know: Science and art, there is clear difference presence between them.

What pay attention to scientificly is logic and experiment, pay attention to reason namely, have abstract sex. Lu Xun learns cure in stage of Japanese celestial being, for " beautiful " , draw blood-vessel intentionally a bit more crooked, be criticized by his teacher cane wild gentleman. The hemal position of human body, not be for " on art beautiful " and of long someplace. Scientific beauty, in Yu Zhen fact, depend on the rational spirit of be practical and realistic.

And artistic? Pay attention to reason to differ with science, art pays attention to sensibility, have figure sex. What beg scientificly is true, truer better. And what art goes after is not certain it is true, go after however -- beautiful. We see Japan move free, use free figure each is long beautiful and beautiful big eye -- apparent, the character in real world, their eye cannot be so big. But, if come according to the scale of actual figure painted, do not have the aesthetic feeling on the sort of art, appear too commonplace without strange.

See surname of physics great master play the version of the gram, his word described the difference between science and art incisively:

"The scientist uses everybody's hep language, depict the knowledge that Everyman does not know;

The artist uses the language that Everyman cannot master, expressive everybody has some feeling. Expressive everybody has some feeling..

The 2nd, between science and art, it is contact.

Scientist and artist, they have similar mind character and morals pledges compatibly, they have identical characteristic.

For instance, the artist has meticulous professional division of labor. Say cinematics, have various division of labor, director, assistant director, playwrite, art design, interpreter, dub, prop, acoustics, wushu is directive, dress, make up, lamplight, photography, recording, specially good effect... be to specific work distinguishs. Science also is same, arrived modern society, science has been differentiated to be a lot of fragmentary course, an old course, have a few small discipline, some scientists study family of an elementary school all one's life, go against the intelligence of the day again, impossible also a person is compatible all course. Say biology, have do turn of gene, have those who do genetic breeding, have those who do zoology agriculture... there is great difference between these major, the scientist may not that does breeding can be done understand turn gene.

Scientist and artist are same, have devote spirit. For instance, buddhist is great artist high art devotes, although living when the destiny is rough, but he did not forgo artistic pursuit. And " scientific god " Newton, devote for science as much, so that he did not marry a wife all one's life. As to Bruno's example, already widely known, he for scientific truth by while still alive be burned dead.

Scientist and artist still have the observation of meticulous in a subtle way, imagination, with extremely rich imagination. Without observation and imagination, da Vinci is not done " unconscious graceful Li Sha " , rice is optimistic fine jade Luo Ye does not have shock popular feeling " David " . The scientist is same also, bowstring theory is how wonderful, put in the space of a 10 dimension unexpectedly, the property of all particle on the world, the spring that can use vibration of a root will depict.

未经允许不得转载:Question » Whether are art and science put in some kind of substaintial connection?