Of the respecting in the title " fierce " sheet is to point to technical level, but this is both between bad really to compare, difference in profession makes one feel worlds apart after all, one is a soldier, one is an athlete, equality of their training requirement, method, water is different completely, do not have at all can compare a gender, what for instance sharp-shooter uses is musket of snipe of for military use, and what fire athlete uses is gas musket merely, do not discuss other, it is recoil level only these two kinds of firearms are not a grade, it is good that the sort of gas rifle that uses when athlete match basically can disregard recoil, but firearms of for military use does not make this kind of standard for certain, so, the operation difficulty that is firearms merely is comparative, musket of snipe of for military use enrages musket with respect to what swing the match to use ten streets!
Still have a bit next, shoot a distance namely, in enraging musket to shoot the match, cent is 50 meters of 10 meters of target, target two kinds, among them 10 meters of target have standing position only, and cent of 50 meters of target criterion is standing position, prone position and kneeling position, this kind of distance is opposite for be closer, but Where is sharp-shooter? Snipe distance did not make clear a regulation, but the definition of sharp-shooter is: In visual outside limits concealment area undertakes monitor and be attackinged killing to target of hostile high value is special arms of service. There is a keyword inside is " visual outside limits " , so, to sharp-shooter, killing a distance to the Ju of goal assignment is of hundreds of meters of above for certain, effective cannon-shot achieved general snipe musket 800 meters, oppose equipment snipe weapon above of effective cannon-shot kilometre very common, and those who look the snipe on preexistence bound records 2000 meters of above is not little also!
So, I want to know, is this both between how to compare? It is to let a top class sharp-shooter use gas musket to hit 50 meters of target with fire champion, still let champion of a fire use musket of snipe of for military use to come with top class sharp-shooter the match of target of an entity of 1000 meters of people? No matter be which kind of, to just be inequity among them, sharp-shooter is trashy musket living energy of life, can here bad to say, but athlete of a fire, be in what in training career, use his is gas musket, and training environment is real gymnasium (the place that is similar shooting range anyway) , the gunpowder gun that you let him use to never had been contacted hits target of entity of 1000 meters of people in the environment of sciamachy field, the result need not think completely more, hit bos for certain!
▲ Munich massacre
Cite a case, happen in the Munich massacre 1972, germany police to cope with terrorist, transferred to shoot an athlete to become temporarily sharp-shooter, as to the result, at that time is expected, a terrorist did not kill these athletes that did not train through any snipe, so, the sharp-shooter that asks in the title and Olympic Games champion who is fierce, be here to be able to not compare a gender at all, anyway I am the fire athlete that feels one had not contacted snipe musket, consider his achievement in the match again good, also won't use snipe rifle for certain, manage together, a top class sharp-shooter, let him hit 50 meters of target with gas musket, also be to be in embarrassed family!