Case of campus ride roughshod over is recurrent, be interrupted in school student front tooth, the p

A few case are below, offer reference

Tort behavior happens inside campus, happen during playtime, the school fails to discover in time and try to check, avoid the happening of the accident, because this school answers civil liability of Zhang Mou with damage a result to assume certain.

Campus ride roughshod over is to point to to puny behavior is bullied between the classmate, happen in middle and primary school more, the victim often can get for a long time ride roughshod over. Campus ride roughshod over exists all the time, phenomenon of campus ride roughshod over grows in intensity in recent years, a lot of incident had arrived appalling degree, get people more and more attention. Incident of campus ride roughshod over can affect the health of body and mind of minor badly, can become a few people even lifelong the does not go nightmare of brandish.

Zhang Mou and Sun Mou all are XX attached primary school 4 years (9) class student. On October 11, 2016 afternoon during playtime, zhang Mou is overturned by Sun Mou without reason, cause Zhang Mou two front tooth are broken to get hurt by knock, be sent to hospital cure after. Already reached intercessory agreement with Zhang Mou now. Zhang Mou is between last term of XX attached primary school, XX attached primary school did not use up responsibility of education, management to cause piece of some tooth damage, have not assume liability to pay compensation, reason mentions to the court this case lawsuit. Appraisal opinion thinks, proposal tooth follow-up treats cost (after 18 one full year of life are grown) need 3000 yuan about / second, every 10-12 year change; Charge of cure of one-time root canal needs 2 front tooth about 1000 yuan.

The court thinks, XX attached primary school regards education as the orgnaization, to the responsibility of education, management and protection is being had in school student, although XX attached primary school made a series of campus security system of education, pass school the means such as the meeting undertook meeting, class explain to public, the responsibility with all had arrived due on the education to the student, management and safety are on guard compulsory, but because tort behavior happens inside campus, happen during playtime, XX attached primary school fails to discover in time and try to check, avoid the happening of the accident, accordingly, XX attached primary school can not implement campus security system of education reach the designated position, certain flaw exists on management, reason answers civil liability of Zhang Mou with damage a result to assume certain. Integrated this case case fact, causal reach party fault level, this academy assumes the liability to pay compensation of 30% by XX attached primary school certainly. Each loss that this academy confirms to Zhang Mou harms an accident to cause because of having school yard originally is total 19865 yuan, compensate for 5960 yuan by 30% scale by XX attached primary school. The accused some elementary school at adjudicating 5960 yuan to become effective hind compensates for accuser Zhang Mou inside 10 days originally.

Be in nursery school, school without person of civil action competence other perhaps education is damaged during orgnaization study, life by person, orgnaization of other perhaps education ought to assume nursery school, school responsibility, but can prove responsibility of education, management, do not assume responsibility. Law of merit of life health authority is protected. Because Zhang Mou removes campus to harm an accident to get hurt originally, lawfully authority wins compensation.