Does that teacher help me see these two connect treasure to a few money be worth?

One is clear Dai Kangxi cloud of the back that connect treasure, one is Ming Dailong Wu Tongbao, you this two add up be worth at most big a few money. Reason: The first article differ, Kang Xi is not complete, edge knock against is fierce, long Wu also is to taste the photograph is poorer, likelihood of puddle or of be handed down from ancient times, but wear away serious. The value that decides coin reachs age besides the quantity that live a life, the most important is to taste, kang Xi connects treasure to have more than 20 bureaus, carrying cloud bureau on the back next is among them, back cloud has Xiaoyun, big Yun Zhi to divide, price is different, the price of good Pin Dayun is in big hundreds of, xiaoyun is illicit casting coin, it is 8 minutes of money commonly, dimension compares great cloud small circuit, vendibility is in a few the left and right sides, of course if taste be on intimate terms oh. For the coin that the word of small Ping Longwu collects world capacity to compare clear generation, the coin history of bright generation is a bit longer more acting than Qing Dynasty coin is little on the quantity that live a life, of general be handed down from ancient times fewer, but Long Wu is not special breed, can saying only is bright generation coin is medium among them money of a the title of an emperor's reign, but the price of small Ping Longwu is OK still, this reason that follows market demand possibly is concerned, the price that tastes be on intimate terms is in small hundreds of. Special breed except. Above is my answer, can thank below reference. -- next graphs are coin of Wu Tongbao of a grand. Offer reference only! @ realizes empty interlocution # to collect coin of # # of # # antique to collect # of coin of # # bright generation

未经允许不得转载:Question » Does that teacher help me see these two connect treasure to a few money be worth?