Why is renaissance met ecbolic individualistic?

This problem is significant, I will be written.

Well-known, renaissance is the campaign of a literacy that with reviving Greek Rome culture gives priority to a problem. And Greek Rome culture, it is a center with the person quite really. But what need knows is, even if Greek Roman, their culture still is collectivistic. Although Greek Roman does not cross minute of mind that adores them, but they still undertake any reflection for main body with city-state.

But, for all that, but to mediaeval person, this has been Jing of blame Chang Zhen. Through the brainwashing with millenarian christian, mediaeval person has been used to be a center with the god in any moment, they are collectivistic, however religious authority creed.

However, in the society that gives priority to body with the god, how can burgeoning bourgeois realize his infinite and outspread desire? To them, overthrow religious authority, be the first important.

In this moment, greek Rome culture was taken, as a kind powerful and enough heterogeneous culture and was carried come out to defy Christian culture.

It is nevertheless in this process, the connotation of Greek Rome culture was distorted by partial ground. The culture of Greek Rome, perhaps say human community in order to emphasize integral person to be core substantially, the person's place can place on a par with the god, because the person formed city-state,be, formed a whole. But bourgeois, those who emphasize is a person is individual, the individual's force -- really Greek Rome culture does not have this, even human history place is done not have.

So far, so called individualistic, just go up in the history for the first time begin to crop up. Bourgeois ability borrows this, had the culture base that can make him force the biggest change.

未经允许不得转载:Question » Why is renaissance met ecbolic individualistic?