20 years before, mr Xue Liyong publishs historical museum " open " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " the mystery that circulate " one article, say that one card is shown " pure department canard " , the result causes a mighty uproar. Ever since, the scholar such as auspiciousing grand of Ishikawa of Hua Zhijian of British Bi Kesai, United States, Japan, had written the article about this one problem, shanghai scholar place writes the article more about this one problem. I think, the angle that studies from the history looks, this problem is clearer. Chen Danyan's contribution is, on the base that she establishs to study positive result in historical scholar, rise literature and historiography union, dig the person life of backside of this one story and thought greatly, especially the activity that the person such as Yan Yongjing opposes concession discriminating against a Chinese, understand that paragraph of history to people, understanding shows an issue about that one card, very helpful.
In historical research, say to have it is difficult to say easily to not have. Want to prove some matter has existed, should have an excellent stuff only enough. And should prove some item is nonexistent, criterion no matter gather how many data, say or state with certainty very hard also " not " . If will come one day some, discovery writes somebody have " the dog must not be entered with the Chinese " a piece of photograph of these 8 words or a file, that this one dense fog is complete clean up.
Whether has beach park existed outside " must not be Chinese and dog entered inside " is the card shown? This is an old issue, also be often be caused recur to, easily the big question of public interest. A few days ago, literary review group is right writer Chen Danyan " of the pubic garden labyrinthian " wait for work to undertake discussion. Media says " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " the card is shown by Chen Danyan " card bogus " , there also is a lot of to turn on the net post. Then, this topic is spoken of by people again. Friend incoming telegram asks: "Is that brand false really? How be to return a responsibility after all? How be to return a responsibility after all??
20 years before, mr Xue Liyong publishs historical museum " open " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " the mystery that circulate " one article, say that one card is shown " pure department canard " , the result causes a mighty uproar. Ever since, the scholar such as auspiciousing grand of Ishikawa of Hua Zhijian of British Bi Kesai, United States, Japan, had written the article about this one problem, shanghai scholar place writes the article more about this one problem. I think, the angle that studies from the history looks, this problem is clearer. Chen Danyan's contribution is, on the base that she establishs to study positive result in historical scholar, rise literature and historiography union, dig the person life of backside of this one story and thought greatly, especially the activity that the person such as Yan Yongjing opposes concession discriminating against a Chinese, understand that paragraph of history to people, understanding shows an issue about that one card, very helpful.
After beach park builds from 1868 outside, whether can be the Chinese entered inside, in different period circumstance it is different.
Look from the material that live a life, in more than 10 years after beach park builds outside, did not hang out his shingle publicly prohibit the Chinese is entered inside, but bureau of the Ministry of Works in feudal China gives your policeman, prohibit the business that sloppily dressed coarse Chinese enters garden is constant some. Still be in 1878, " declare " the article that publishs a requirement to open garden to ban, the pubic of Hong Kong calls the garden inside, also forbid Chinese discrepancy before, but after harbor superintend and director holds the post of easily, belong to with this matter different unjust, cut into parts then go this makes, the Chinese is able to enter garden. Shanghai and Hong Kong thing are same law, relax is banned at those hereat, what truth is this? When the article emphasizes a garden founding, the tax that uses debt to include a Chinese is silver-colored inside, ban a Chinese therefore today and do not make swim, very inequitable. Arrive from 1881 1889, comprador of a few foreign firm and the Chinese that have Western learning background, crack oneself up is creditable Chinese or classy Chinese, wait like Yan Yongjing, Tang Maozhi, ceaseless to make a stand against of bureau of the Ministry of Works in feudal China, strive for garden authority. 1889, via Shanghai talk station Gong Zhaoyuan appears personally bargaining, bureau of the Ministry of Works in feudal China yields eventually, by committee of concession fair garden or secretary-general of bureau of the Ministry of Works in feudal China, drink card of hair Chinese pleasance, every card can take 4 people, be restricted to use a week. Sent pleasance card in all 1889 183 pieces, annual has 700 bearer into garden Chinese estimation. This paragraph of history explains, inside period of time, bureau of the Ministry of Works in feudal China is park of the beach outside allowing a Chinese to enter limitedly.
The circumstance changed somewhat 1890, it is Chinese of the excursive that enter garden than before greatly grow in quantity, the person is completely suffer from, affected the foreigner's excursion; 2 it is the Chinese appears in the park a few indelicate phenomena, somebody plucks at will flower, trample lawn, somebody is about to sit alone one stool, do not agree to sit in all with the person; 3 it is somebody in the practise fraud on pleasance certificate, if change date, overdue ticket is taken again use etc. Then, bureau of the Ministry of Works in feudal China built a very small new park in Suzhou Henan face (park of Yi Chenhua's person) , in order to deal with a Chinese, at the same time forbidden Chinese is entered outside beach park. After this, arrive all the time the ban cancelled 1928, just let a Chinese enter garden.
So, "Must not be Chinese and dog entered inside " how be to return a responsibility after all? This word should divide a face to say.
Above all, write clearly have " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " the card of 8 words is shown, had not gotten to now corroborant. Recently of apply colours to a drawing of the place on media " card bogus " , namely at this point. A lot of people say to had seen " the Chinese must not be entered with the dog inside " the card is shown. 1903, what Zhou Zunren says he sees is " dog and Chinese forbid " 7 words; What Cai Hesen said he sees 1923 is " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " 8 words; Sun Zhongshan said 1924 is " the dog must not be entered with the Chinese " so 8 words. In addition, chen Dai grandson, Zhou Erfu, Cao Juren, Su Buqing, Song Zhenting say to exist really. But, wh whoever act as a matchmaker passes soon, had not discovered to now the first-hand data enough such as an a piece of photograph, file proves to have so the card is shown. The Yang Kaihui's father, Yang Chang aid that holds the position of Beijing University professor later, this one shop sign that he saw record and narrate 1913 shows is: "Shou Bangyun of door of Shanghai occidental park: The Chinese must not be entered; Cloud dog must not be entered. " it is finer that his record and narrate should say heart, clear.
In historical research, say to have it is difficult to say easily to not have. Want to prove some matter has existed, should have an excellent stuff only enough. And should prove some item is nonexistent, criterion no matter gather how many data, say or state with certainty very hard also " not " . If will come one day some, discovery writes somebody have " the dog must not be entered with the Chinese " a piece of photograph of these 8 words or a file, that this one dense fog is complete clean up.
Next, contain " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " the card of the meaning is shown, exist really. In existent data, the earliest account of this one content, the park that was 1885 visits regulation. Regular in all 6: "One, bicycle and dog forbid inside; 2, of the child take a car to should be in on the side on alley carry out; 3, prohibit deflowering catch bird's nest and damage tree of flowers and plants, the behoove such as the parents of every child and commission Fu is careful all the more, lest this waits for affection thing; 4, forbid the office of play music; 5, divide on the west outside commission fall forward of the person, chinese entirely forbids inside; 6, the child is not had person companion forbids on the west inside garden. " this one regular income " constitution of room of policeman of bureau of communal concession the Ministry of Works in feudal China " , till 1928, more than 40 years go up in words and expressions or have difference, each order or have fluctuant, but basic content did not change.
Again, these 6 regulation (it is sometimes 7) it is to be written in the card to show go up, establish entrance of outer beach park. This is a fact, the photograph is in, also never the person has denied. If 6 the first medium incorporates with the 5th,rise, become " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " , have already former justice, be not former appearance again. Say to have already former justice, because be in 6 in the center, have really " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " meaning, show this shop sign reduce " Chinese and dog must not be entered inside " , also not be out of thin air, complete fake. Say to be not former appearance again, because be in 6 in the center, "Chinese and dog " be not carry directly write repeatedly. Cent is carried with carry, meaning accumulate naturally different, reader from but appreciate the difference in this. If 6 in the center, all can carry at will, so, the 6th regulation is not had the child of person companion must not be entered on the west inside, will the 6th with the first is carried, won'ted do " child and dog must not be entered inside " !
Come for years, the author is taken care all the time about outside the data of beach park, although the park has 6 times already, accordingly, the Chinese such as Yan Yongjing took the place of to undertake make a stand against 1880, but in the document before 1900, heretofore has not seen somebody general park is regular the first, the 5th circumstance that place on a par, also did not see from contemptuous Chinese angle general Chinese and dog connection represent indignant case together. So, why is the problem shown to appear about the card after 1900? This is a problem that deserves research.
Accessary point out, prohibit the Chinese is entered inside, not only outside beach park, other concession park, include rainbow mouth park, million abundant park (today Zhongshan park) , French park (revive today park) , with etc a lot of public, also be to prohibit before 1928 the Chinese is entered inside.
