How is case of arson of baby-sitter of look upon Hangzhou two lawyers with apologetic baby-sitter?

I think the action of two assign counsel for the defence is inferior to party lawyer very one of! Since the court holds issue of existence of establishment of property fire control, counsel for the defence should die to the injured party down property neglect one's duty reason node, and consequence of belongings loss case assumes corresponding responsibility to offer an opinion to the court, strive for for the accused person assume fewer blame to punish, the lawyer like syncretic of this ability accord with ought to duty!

未经允许不得转载:Question » How is case of arson of baby-sitter of look upon Hangzhou two lawyers with apologetic baby-sitter?