99 careless language: 3 canister red ox causes the contrary mood of peasant worker worker and undergraduate group, this itself is fussily, it is argumentative! a thing that ought to be bagatelle originally, rise to moral level, it is not sensible more.
Recently more than 20 years, it is college enlarge action on one hand, it is billowy farmer goes into town on the other hand Wu strike movement, ecbolic piece socially two swarm body, undergraduate group and peasant industry group.
Between body of this two swarm, as a result of idea idea and working content disparate, be full of each other do not understand.
Is this probably " incident of 3 canister red ox " germ place?
Look in the author, this kind of contradictory occurrence, itself ought not to!
The first, the bearing of 3 installation workers how?
Do not have what problem!
Above all, the author did not arrive in the search on the net the introduction about this thing, suspicion is somebody is fabricated, next, this thing itself has unreasonable place, the school installs air conditioning, arrange how possibly in the late night a bit, doesn't the student sleep?
Of course, the title gave us to become this is a true thing, and installation worker is peasant worker worker.
If they drank Gong Niu, also did not happen when what, I think the moral quality of 3 workers has a problem, that is stolen namely.
But they kept scrip and money, that is different.
The worker also is a person, the body also is met tired, work work a late night a bit, see there is drink in the dormitory, take drank, even if this kind of behavior has unreasonable place, also do not calculate big mistake, because they are subjective,go up to did not take the ill will of people thing in vain.
The 2nd, take the issue of money about having a thing.
3 workers are clear, thing of make things difficult for others should give money, they also give money.
I say a case. In those days the thing that the Red Army often produces, pass when a team somewhere, the villager ran, soldier tired hungry, had the thing in villager home, scrip and money keep when be being faced.
Has everybody heard of this kind of thing? Does that calculate steal?
I feel not to calculate.
The 3rd, about 10 yuan of questions with whether logical money.
Right, 3 canister red ox is more than 10 yuan of money.
But in light of the peasant worker worker that has contacted from me, it is very economical for the most part, for instance, water is not bought to drink when can drinking tap water, can drink mineral water not to buy beverage to drink.
In eye of worker worker of a peasant, he does not have the concept of athletic beverage, he sees the Gong Niu with one canister very small size, he thinks this wants than mineral water at most expensive, but also at most a little a bit more expensive just.
I dare affirm, 3 labour are factitious keep how many money, once had had a controversy.
Drank 3 bottles of beverage with very small size, drink readily did not have, keep 10 yuan of money, be a bit much?
Probable a worker said, much much dot, do not let family student look down on us, family student is not easy also, the money that comes out more, should do legwork to them had been expended.
The 4th, undergraduate also do not feel what 3 view not 3 view.
This thing is done not have necessary the administrative levels that rises to 3 view, do not have more necessary rise to moral level.
In light of the farmer industry that knows from me, strength is normally straighter, without too much turn the turn is circled in the heart, what be what be.
In other words, if let them spend 10 yuan of money really, buy 3 canister Gong Niu to drink, estimate them not be willing to part with or use!
So, if the student returns a dormitory, discovery became little 3 canister red ox, much a piece of scrip and 10 yuan of money, also ought to go with good-tempered psychology look upon this problem.
This socially, between different group, much portion understands and ought to include.
I so say.
In Chinese society of future, peasant worker worker won't be peasant worker worker forever, they can produce differentiation gradually, stay in the farmer of the life in the city to be versed in, will evolve into the worker that is all trades and professions, they basically rely on physical strength to have a meal.
After the undergraduate graduates, with technical the job is given priority to, basically rely on a head to have a meal, but the undergraduate also can produce differentiation, have outstanding also have not outstanding.
So you look, prospective China, worker and undergraduate two swarm body, not certain who does look down on!
The person with the nice technology in the worker, income and social class will be higher.
Can become only all one's life in the undergraduate office article member, income and position, affirmation is very low.
Last word: At present social reality, undergraduate and peasant industry group, it is social component. With foreign development the trend looks, in prospective China society, who is tall who is low, return true it's hard to say.
