American overseas has the base of most abroad military affairs on the world, did American university teach David 2015? Wei En published " the country of base: How does base of American abroad military affairs endanger the United States and whole world " one book. Introduce in the book, american overseas has base of 686 military affairses, this data is Wei En the professor spent 6 years of time to consult, textual research and, and here still does not include those check the secret war base that be less than, actual amount should be close to 800. The Norfolk navy base of American mainland
Say as to somebody " the U.S. Army has base of 274 abroad military affairses " , this is nonsense apparently. The U.S. Army has 140 base in Japan only, there is base of 41 military affairses in Korea, singapore, Malaysia, Philippine have U.S. Army base etc, in still having inferior the area has U.S. Army base like the national capital such as Afghanistan. Amount of base of U.S. Army military affairs still is not most, europe just is the United States has the place with martial most base besides mainland. 274, this data also does not know to pat cerebral door to be thought out.
The United States creates these martial base, namely the interest for him United States serves, the strategic demand that this is the United States, strategy thinks. As to " protect this country not to suffer aggression, concern to advance democratic process, stimulative two countries " etc, it is the lie of fool person completely: Cannot bring a profit to the United States, beg an U.S. Army trashy also. The interest here, it is to point to economic interest not just, it is strategic interest more. Treat the global deploy condition of U.S. Army base, with respect to meeting discovery: The U.S. Army controlled the channel passageway of the great majority on the world. Controlled these maritime passageways, what to mean?
If the United States is in,with this national happening contradicts, this country asks the United States is removed army, can how?
The U.S. Army builds martial base in some country before, meeting and this country sign an agreement. This includes in share agreement: Hire, establishment creates use fixed number of year of the U.S. Army, right, field, aid plans to wait all and relevant content a moment, break a contact handles measure / method is indispensable of course. Will look at present, besides Cuba, still do not have which country meeting break a promise, break a contact is meant as contrary as the United States, great majority country stands not to remove this kind of consequence. When the agreement expires, renewing the contract no longer is the step that a lot of countries take: For instance Philippine, Vietnam, the U.S. Army can mog only, search another countries to build new martial base again. Insist to renew the contract no longer, the United States does not have method, can mog only.
If this country asks the U.S. Army withdraws, u.S. Army forcibly occupy is worn even if do not go, should how?
Once produce the situation in the problem, the United States has active right, according to entente regulation, this country needs to pay the United States " penalty due to breach of contract " , still get an United States " fool " . The data that does not have this respect from beginning to end can be checked, estimate this " penalty due to breach of contract " be afraid of is common country stands not to rise at all. Want " move thick " -- does the armed strength drive away an U.S. Army? Still wash wash sleep, will look at present, this is the behavior of court death. Below this kind of circumstance, if the U.S. Army insists to be not removed, this country does not have the way with efficient what. Exclusive and feasible is: U.S. Army of people protest, influence trains normally etc, but must assure to be inside entente limits, otherwise the U.S. Army also won't eat to good fruit.
Of Cuba close a tower that rub it is this kind of circumstance, cuba asks the U.S. Army withdraws, the U.S. Army insists to be not removed, cuba and United States fought so much year also fail to let an U.S. Army mog. What sign because of the U.S. Army is agreement of perpetual war base, can say an U.S. Army not break a contact. Occupy some data to show, firstly year hire has 4000 dollars only, cuba is rejection. The United States does not go namely, cuba also does not have method.
Big country of other military affairs is sought to create martial base around, form diversionary? This is not what tweak: Of wolf of the drive that bring a tiger plan, a lane is bad, both ends gets hurt. Resort U.N. , let public opinion use force to the United States? U.N. most be the United States, public opinion directs is the United States more controlling, so do no-good. Besides United States not break a contact, at manage also have not a leg to stand on.
Have an adage: It is difficult to ask a god to send a god easily. If be the U.S. Army is going back on his word not to go, that can be to pray only sacred, besides, do not have its law.
