This problem is very good, want to read language above all, should look why!
If wrong thing is wrong,one is led person, scold a few, understandable still, for the job, pressure is great, send a few complaint, or it is tie subordinate, be give no cause for more criticism.
Above all, this leader, it is a subordinate certainly when people on one's own side, just can try more severe bind, for production, develop, to subordinate, with word severity, also be to improve efficiency, increase production value.
In have a proof, this leader also is disposition go-between, not be the generation of blackness, having one is one, having 2 is 2, strict and fair in meeting out rewards and punishments, do not want enlarge, the behavior of a name-calling, it is right, it is wrong, all of us does not know a family to who scold again, because what gets angry, go evaluating pair of faults.
This thing is too far-fetched, my individual thinks, lead to, praise and honor, and not name-calling is not good leader this question does not happen an impact, not is name-calling good leader? Not be of course, not name-calling also is not good leader certainly, so? Is name-calling bad leader certainly? Not certain also.
Above all, good leader, with bad leader, cannot use scold not name-calling will think, this I feel everybody also can be agreed with, what is good leader, want to see enterprise benefit, company culture, the long-term development power of the enterprise, the leader's cohesive affinity, income force of the worker, the worker's welfare, the worker's centripetal force, can good these processing leader, my individual thinks is good leader.
A leader every day name-calling, the enterprise does not have outstanding achievement, without cohesive affinity, did not expand power, the worker also won't have centripetal force, also be to be pulled in vain, also not be a good leader.
Individual viewpoint, ask authority corrective.
