If owner discovers to there is thief outside the window, he cries greatly catch thief, the building

Plain truth: Producing owner of this kind of thing to appoint need not assume any responsibility.

Before on us a of the village upstairs happening over- so a thing, those who say is a thief goes stealing a thing in owner home, was discovered by owner when climbing a window. Next owner issues thief disclose with mop building, fall dead, ultimate owner is sentenced to assume the liability to pay compensation of 70% . Caused the dissatisfaction of a lot of people at that time, think to be sentenced so punish too inequitable to owner.

But, from legal angle for, owner the sort of way that leaves thief disclose the floor with mop has defended namely when, adjacent even at intended homicide, so, of law sentence punish and do not have too big question. However, in this thing, apparent, thief by owner break drink and frighten so that drop the building dies, can saying only is punitive justice.

Above all for, this cry out of owner: "Catch thief " go up from literal meaning for, it is a kind of safe to oneself safeguard only, it is us when facing risk a kind normal should stimulate response. Say not to calculate even going up is defensive, after all, this word connects pair of thief threaten not to calculate on.

And thief dropping building dies, because,also not be of owner this catchs thief, be discovered because of oneself pilfer behavior however, plus oneself psychological quality is no good. So, temporarily panic-stricken, produced an accident.

After all, we always cannot be in when discovering thief is about to want to slip into room pilfer, pretend intentionally still not to know next. Allow by thief thieve, this does not accord with constant manage apparently. And law also supports us average citizen protects his life safety and belongings security in reasonable limits exercise right. So, thief family member has no right to put forward any compensation to ask. Say reality a bit, what originally you are engaged in is the thing of tall redound of a kind of high risk, as thief you also should assume this kind of risk.

Since encounter so the family member that tells law, so we still are say of mix say of this kind of family member really.

Above all, very specific issue, owner need not have compensatory like thief family member completely. But, from legal angle for, this thief climbs the family's window in at dead of night, had been to owner one caused huge psychology harm apparently. The likelihood is in after producing this kind of job, owner a few months can not sleep certainly smooth and steady become aware. Lane is bad to there is a wind to give grass to move outside, can be slept lightly, harm of this kind of spirit is very serious. So, come from legal meaning say, owner has the right to undertake to thief family member mental loss is compensated for. And, thief family member also should undertake compensatory.

Like this kind requirement owner has compensatory family member, I think owner is necessary really relatively this true, let family member of the other side undertake compensatory to oneself next. After all, this kind knows a fault not to change, instead the person with one again wrong fault is to not was necessary to undertake sympathize with and forgiving to them. Instead, should let them from go up at all realize: Be apt to has cable of be apt to, sow the wind and reap the whirlwind!