Since do not have the system of absolute safety, why does that pay treasure without hacker breach?

Ma Yun once had said, if the bank is a hacker only,arrived the word of ability passivity defence, pay treasure to let a hacker do not enter less than of 10 kilometers limits namely. Upgrade large-scaly in 8 years especially after safeguarding, pay treasure can to say to return safety than the Pentagon.

Introduce according to the engineer in A, be not is to attack do not go in, although attack,went in to be able to form a chain-reacting, open protects a program, and worst result breaks down in A namely, and in this time, this among them capital cannot turn a fraction, wait for engineer rehabilitate only ability is OK. Besides, the every time in A trades have a lot of backup, and not be to be in centrally same an area, although the hacker was revised among them the database of data of a server, a racoon dog also can pass big data its reductive the accuracy that assures data.

Be equivalent to now is with the bank one individual character pledges in A, the hacker plays on the net at ordinary times, black others computer question is not big, if inbreak in A as inbreaking bank, this is according to what rob a blame to sentence, so the hacker also is not willing to risk this danger to inbreak to pay treasure without holding Alibaba mostly.

Of course, the ace nature in A is the engineer team with powerful backside, these people are the ace of top level commonly, built up big ox of safety of a lot of Internet, still having a lot of people among them is before the person that detective police retires, be being investigated to crime have a lot of experience etc.

Now, know why to pay treasure to inbreaked without the hacker!

未经允许不得转载:Question » Since do not have the system of absolute safety, why does that pay treasure without hacker breach?