Final result should read investigation conclusion of course, should fill hand in fill hand in, the amerce of condemnable money. Final question is like what did not imagine so serious, film as usual sends careful, careful crosses as usual to show, everything does it lawfully. Mobile phone 1, do 2 have the mobile phone to be in without what break the law? If somebody thinks suggestive oneself, damaged oneself reputation and image, sue charge, law is met oneself redress the scales. If do not have illegal part, according to why is He Lv banned mirror? Say a certain celebrity does not like? Is this too strange also?
Now is have two two correlation of cause and effect, things that differ completely again at the same time, lump. One is the motion picture that takes before Feng Xiaogang (new film and before have concern without continue, still use name of a mobile phone only, I do not know to be not discussed) suggestive Cui Yongyuan, cui terribly is rusty, 2 it is Cui Yongyuan accusation Feng Fan Liu has suspicion of tax evasion imposition.
Assume now, and this kind of hypothesis is not to do not have a likelihood, at the outset the story that Feng Xiaogang, Liu Zhenyun took master of ceremonies of a depict to uncover black vicious power, leading role is very similar Cui Yongyuan, can everything today's still happen? I see may not. If Cui Yongyuan is true what praise like a lot of person place is just in that way and exalted, so no matter the film of Feng Liu Fan is suggestive,he still eulogized he, be like to doubt break the law violate the behavior of evade taxes evade taxation of compasses to should inform against exposure. And reality is, avowed to film problem be not wanted to be solved through legal channel again by harm, turn around an exposure in coming in contract of yin and yang one fellow, those who lift is righteous old standard, of travel is the eye ground that discharge illicit hates.
