Should the land of dead population call in?

This problem, involve the land policy of our country, join the real case that I work, I say the condition here.

At present our land policy is collective system of ownership and domestic couplet are produced contract the system that makes photograph tie. That is to say, land is country and collective all, country and village collective go to these land cent contracting for the family manage. What every family has to land is long-term right of administration, is not droit.

When be being torn open as to a few change that ask for the ground, may buy outright according to tens of thousands of yuan of a mu price, but those who need a specification is, those who buy outright is you contract right of administration, is not droit.

Land allocates in collective of village of Chinese great majority (it is land ownership of distributive management land actually) will be divided on average according to population. But, the form that land contracts is domestic couplet is produced contract make, the kind that all members produce family of meaning that is to say jointly contracts land. Be contract for the unit with the family of right of administration. Such result is, land is managed is an unit with the family. The country places the land of every family truly with legal form, later this area is fixed, at that time is 30 years changeless, do not adjust, just derive from this " add a person not to buy the land, go the person does not go the ground " view.

So, in a family, after a member dies, his ground still is by the family the member is continued to manage, it is to won't call in of land. But if this family was done not have, include die entirely or integral change went, so the land that they manage is to need to be called in by village collective. Next village collective undertakes dealing with by policy.

未经允许不得转载:Question » Should the land of dead population call in?