How is look upon Tecent fined because of unfair competition 50 thousand?

How is look upon Tecent fined because of unfair competition 50 thousand?

Hemp hot gentleman hunts down all from weather eye yesterday: Tecent receives the administration of Shenzhen city industrial and commercial bureau to punish Wu Moyuan because of unfair competition, remarks is: "Anounce material true and lawful, all responsibility by party conceit " , legal entity is Ma Huateng. Well-known, tecent serves as a market prise 3 trillion, only game professional work is day-to-day can with " 100 million " the business that enters Zhang for the unit, wu Moyuan's punishment, it is 9 oxen are less than one wool simply. Hemp hot gentleman thinks, before this, the public relations branch of Tecent, law Wu branch or Tecent provides it may not be a bad idea high, ought to do many works, so the punishment of this Wu Moyuan perhaps is the government is warned to Tecent merely, but, this admonitory utter to Tecent word, mean its to ought to make necessary explanation to the public, how to also safeguard fair market competition environment effectively to make action of very good early-warning to Tecent future.

Above checks the punishment that government-owned net inquires to decide a book for weather eye

Actually, the head vacates big fight since had begun on June 1, 2018, and, grow in intensity as the competition of bilateral product business, smell of gunpowder is grumous, have in those days the flavour of 3Q big fight, according to hemp hot gentleman understands, be in the court just ruled on January 31 this year prohibit byte beats the banner issues watermelon video living broadcast " Wang Zherong boasts " , this also is home first such ban.

Shake phonic president Zhang Nan to also be in today first on those who published pair of Tecent is accuse: Tecent asks we, delete the head that shows a large number of user accredit synchronism on App more and pet name directly, include this build of myself to resemble. Show a group to experience for the user more, hint inside App user proper motion is revised, article table makes the same score solid clarity not quite, had criticized a group yesterday.

Shake president of phonic nearsightedness frequency: Zhang Nan

Actually, tecent puts forward to delete user information in litigant requirement not only, and it is in Tianjin seaside the court urges litigant ban directly. Reason is a part shaking phonic user is land with small letter on the history, through the head portrait that the user confirms accredit him synchronism and nickname, when shaking phonic illicit letter to upgrade into independent App to shine more, the user is used shake phonic Zhang date to land go up via affirming accredit is shining more again continue to use head portrait and nickname. So Tecent asks our server deletes user data directly, the head that includes hemp hot him gentleman and nickname... hemp hot gentleman used what how the head that uses ten years and nickname became Tecent. We discover not hard, besides the head, shake the platform such as sound to get small letter likely besides the information such as user head portrait and nickname, actually most platform is registered in new user in whole Internet when, all can offer to the user " use small letter or the option that QQ logs onto " , so, why to can Tecent pay close attention to only and prohibit a subordinate product get Tecent user data? This problem we are OK from in those days the analysis of casuse and effect of 3Q big fight knows just a little. Be an interest drive, it is safe bodyguard and the competition that Tecent stewards in those days, nowadays is to tremble sound and small inspected competition. . . . . . But anyhow, netizens are opposite generally Tecent by was expressed to support by punishment, the amount that represents punishment is too little, honest to Tecent it is not to ache not to itch. Hemp hot gentleman is not the point of view that often endorses a netizen, do you agree? The welcome discusses in comment area.

未经允许不得转载:Question » How is look upon Tecent fined because of unfair competition 50 thousand?